On Conflict Settlement Essay

Schick (1995) defines a contravention as a characteristic structure of desires and a belief (p. 58). A conflict arises when an agent wants x and y wherein x and y be the only options acquirable to the agent. Given this situation, an agent may choose to react in 2 ways. First, the agent may choose to avoid the conflict or second, the agent may choose to collapse the conflict. In the resolution of a conflict, the agent starts to think rationally by seizing to think that the options available to him involves choosing both x and y or losing both x and y.In this sense, the agent enables the resolution of the conflict through an internal mediation of his or her desires. The same thing applies when it comes to interpersonal conflict. The difference between the twain merely lies in the existence of a particular situation wherein the desires and beliefs of two or more agents pass to counter that of the other. This shows the manner in which conflicts enable the balancing of power at b ottom an agent or within a convention (Rummel, 1991, p. 76).The balancing of powers resulting from the occurrence of a conflict enables the balancing of the following elements interests, capabilities, and wills. Rummel (1991) notes conflict is a balancing of individual interests, capabilities, and wills. It is a simultaneous solution to the equations of power (p. 77). Within an interpersonal conflict, it does not unavoidably mean that the agent(s) whose beliefs and desires take precedence over the other is the agent(s) who hold power within a group.The rest of powers refers to the mutual satisfaction of the different and contending interests within a group. In other words, the balance of powers may be understood as the result of the mediation within an interpersonal conflict. In the previous presentation, one of the groups presented locomote that may be followed in case a conflict arises. The steps that they provided involve the agent(s) development of self-awareness.The grande ur of self-awareness here can be seen if one considers that it is only through the agent(s) identification of the clashing beliefs and desires that the agent(s) will be able to achieve the resolution of the conflict. This was shown by the group through a skit that they presented in class. One force note that in the skit itself, the group was able to present that failure to develop awareness may overtake to aggression which might notwithstanding enhance the conflict at hand.The importance of this skit does not lie in its means of providing an example for those who were present it also enabled the audiences direct experience of a conflict. Deutsch et al (2006) notes, observing models deal effectively with difficult situations allows the observer to achieve greater freedom in header with current and future problems of all sorts (p. 309). Despite of this, the group however, was unable to show that resolution and aggression are not the only means in which a conflict may end.Matthews and Roberts (2004) notes that conflicts may also croak to collaboration and appeals to authority (p. 451). Although one might state that this also leads to the resolution of a conflict in the sense that it ends a conflict, it is important to note that conflicts that end in this manner further breeds the creation of further disagreements amongst the agent(s) involved. Matthews and Roberts (2004) further notes that in the resolution of a conflict, there are certain skills which individuals should learn.These involve active listening, assertiveness, normal of feelings in appropriate ways, empathy and perspective taking, cooperation, negotiation, and methods for countering bias (p. 451). Although the group was unable to present all of these point, they were able to pass along well the information that they had prepared for the presentation. In summary, given the time constraints on the group, I think the group was able to relay helpful information that will aid the members of the aud ience in the process of arrest and handling situations that may lead to both personal and interpersonal conflict.References Deutsch, M. et al. (2006). The Handbook of Conflict Resolution supposition and Practice. San Francisco Jossey-Bass Publishers. Matthews, G. & R. Roberts. (2004). Emotional Intelligence Science and Myth. Massachusetts MIT Press. Rummel, R. (1991). The Conflict Helix. London Transaction Publishers. Schick, F. (1997). Making Choices A rephrasing of Decision Theory. Cambridge Cambridge University Press.