Wednesday, May 8, 2019
Judicial Activism Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words
discriminative Activism - Assignment ExampleThe reason why I came down on Brennans side is that I find his point of view more realistic and progressive compared to Meeses conservatism of sticking to the recitation by the Framers of the Constitution, which is difficult, if not impossible, to determine.Borrowing from his words, I just find it unsettling that the Constitution was meant to be interpreted besides as the founding fathers intended because it would be impossible to determine what their exact thoughts were given the time elapsed afterwards the Constitution was framed.There may be notes and documents made during the debate in Philadelphia when the drafting of the Constitution was still in process but they will always be incomplete and can only give a hint of the intent of the Framers and cannot provide the total idea of the Framers when the Constitution was drafted.Assuming for the sake of argument that we should base our interpretations on the original intent of the Frame rs of the Constitution, the best record available during the drafting process of the Constitution that represents the thought of the Framers only represents about 7 percent of the Philadelphia debates.Gleaning from this figure, it is likely that succeeding interpretation would be to interpret it in the agency of judicial activism for the utter lack of documents to base the decision. I may wholeheartedly agree that the Framers of the Constitution had the noblest conception when they drafted the Constitution but they could not possibly anticipate nor box the realities of future according to the wisdom of their time.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.