Difference between Teacher and Learner Centered Approach

Difference between T for each oneer and student Centered ApproachThe modern education tends to shift from the teacher-centered to the student-centered erudition. In actuality, the outgrowth of the modern education stimulates educators and students to change their traditional approach to education and to knowledge. At this point, it is worth mentioning the fact that student-centered approach becomes particularly effective in the contemporaneous environment because students tend to become much than and more autonomous in the course of accomplishment. The latter results from the emerging remove for students to understand independently of their teachers and, what is scour more chief(prenominal), students need to carry on schooling even later on the end of their education. At the aforesaid(prenominal) time, many specialists (Sporre, 2003) argue that modern students excite different needs and wants and educators need to use the student-centered approach to organize the wat ching cognitive operation effectively. In actuality, educators need to develop their paid skills and abilities and extend their professional familiarity far beyond the mere education and training that they should also extend their professional knowledge, skills and abilities to the field of psychology and culture. In fact, educators should management on the student-centered acquirement to reach success in their give way with students and, what is more primary(prenominal), in such a way, they prep ar students to the life-time learning because students grow more confident in their ability to learn, when educators use the student-centered approach to learning.The shift from teacher-centered to student-centered learningIn actuality, the shift from the teacher-centered learning to the student-centered learning has become obvious. In this respect, it is important to understand causes of the shift toward the student-centered learning in order to restrain all the way the study di rections in the development of the student-centered learning. Basically, the teacher-centered learning was grounded on the position of educators as the highest business office. The main function of a teacher was to teach students, to provide them with information, to patron them to learn the learning material and to acquire trustworthy set of knowledge along with basic skills and abilities the education aims at.However, today, such an approach to learning is out-of-date and it does not work effectively anymore. To put it more precisely, the modern applied science and science book progressing at the unparalleled pace. In such a situation, the provision of students with a steadfast set of knowledge has little optimistic effects on the further professional and personal life of students because the rigid set of knowledge becomes out-of-date fast and by the end of the schooling or college, students need to start learning on and on to keep pace with the speedily changing technolo gy and science. In such rapidly changing environment, students need to be able to find effective approaches to learning to be able to learn autonomously of educators.In this respect, it is important to lay dialect on the fact that each student is unique and educators should shift toward the student-centered learning, where educators practise the role of a guide, who helps students to develop basic skills and abilities and to acquire knowledge students need in their regular life as well as in their future professional career. Specialists (Doll, 2001) stand on the ground that the student-centered learning increases the potentiality of learning because educators find the individual approach to each student. This means that educators learn the cultural background of students, their psychological peculiarities, individual characteristics, their academic successes and current take aim of development. In such a way, using the aforementioned information, teachers gutter devote the stud ent-centered learning to meet needs and wants of each student and to prepare him or her to the effective learning.Environment beneficial for student-centered learningThe maximization of the effectiveness of learning is one of the major goals of the learning march. At the same time, to reach a considerable success in learning, especially using the student-centered approach to learning, it is inevitable to create environment, which is favorable for the implementation of the student-centered learning. In actuality, this means that educators should focus on students needs and wants not only in a short-run vista but also in a long-run one. Therefore, educators should understand that students allow need to keep learning even after the end of a school, college, or University. In such a situation, educators should prepare students to the idea of the aliveness learning.However, the idea of the lifetime learning implies that students should understand that they will need to learn on thei r own without the assistance of educators. Consequently, the autonomy of students should become one of the major elements of the student-centered learning. To create such environment, where students feel autonomous, educators can encourage the group work of students, work of students on different projects, encourage their volunteer work, and so on. However, it is important to lay emphasis on the fact that educators should always assist students. They should be guides for their students, who can give a piece of valuable advice, who can turn in the way students should pass on their own.In this regard, specialists (Doll, 2005) argue that the autonomy of students comprises an inherent part of the student-centered learning. Students feel free in the learning dish out. They can necessitate the subject to learn, the time to learn, and so on. Educators, in their turn, develop the broadcast, guide and arrest students. The control is particularly important in the student-centered because students should not feel the pinch from the part of educators. Instead, they should feel the support and trust from the part of educators. At the same time, it is contingent to recommend introducing self-control among students. For instance, students can work on certain projects and hold forth them in their groups, whereas an educator just performs a role of an authority or expert, who express his or her opinion on the subject, but students define whether their work was successful or not. In such a way, students are engaged in the learning process, they become quick participants of the learning process, kinda of passive subjects to the learning process as is the case of the teacher-centered learning.Active learningAt this point, specialists (Hooks, 1994) stress that the students involvement in the learning process should be based on combat-ready learning, which means that students participate actively in the learning process and they collaborate with educators instead of perc eiving the learning material from educators. The active learning implies that students work on their own education and define their learning. For instance, students can choose subjects to learn. This is the manifestation of the active learning.In practice, the active learning is often superficial and does not really provide students with freedom to participate in the learning process on the equal ground with educators. In this respect, it is possible to recommend engaging students in the development of the learning object. For instance, students can view certain preferences and inclinations to issues which do matter for them. Therefore, educators, while working on the curriculum and planning the learning process, should monitor needs and wants of students. For instance, before or at the beginning of the school year, educators can conduct interviews or questionnaires involving students in the shade of the plan of learning. For instance, educators can ask students about their pref erences and particular interests in their subject, or else they can students about issues they consider to be the most important in their subject, and so on.Critical thinkingThe active fight of students into the learning process stimulates the development of unfavorable thinking students. For instance, when students work in groups or when they discuss the work of each other in the class on projects, they rate their own work, they learn how to think critically and analytically. In such a context, students start thinking not as students but rather as educators, not as subjects to the learning process but as active participants of the learning process, who do not just learn and work on assignments but who assess and quantify critically the work of other students. Obviously, the critical thinking is crucial in this regard and educators can stimulate the development of critical thinking through role plays and creation of situations when students need to evaluate the work of each othe r.ConclusionThus, taking into account all preceding(prenominal) mentioned, it is important to lay emphasis on the fact that the learning process is complicated and today it shifts toward the student-centered learning. The student-centered learning implies that students become active participants of the learning process instead of mere subjects to the learning process as used to be the case of the teacher-centered approach. The student-centered learning can become successful through the engagement of students in the learning process when they participate in the development of the plan of the learning process, when their interests and needs are taken into consideration by educators in the course of the development of lesson plans and curriculum, when students can evaluate and assess the work of each other and when they can work autonomously, whereas educators perform the role of guides.